California SB-798 (A Senate Bill that affects all of us)

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. BigFish

    BigFish New Member

    9
    0
    Queensbury
    SB-798 is a California proposal now being considered to become law and will require all airsoft replicas to be manufactured in bright colors or to be clear so as to see the inner workings of the replica. The change in appearance to an airsoft replica as described by the proposed law will have a direct negative effect on the airsoft community for Milsim and Reenactment players in California and will impact the rest of the country as well by effecting the product we can buy, jeopardizing law enforcement safety by confusing replicas with real firearms, and by helping set a standard for other states to follow with their own misguided version of SB-798. SB-798 is a reaction to incidents such as the shooting of a thirteen year old Los Angeles boy on December 10, 2010 on a dark street. Certainly the families of the teens and the police officers involved have felt the consequences after the shooting, but the consequences go far beyond the police officers and the families of the teens involved. The actions of irresponsible teens focused the spotlight of attention negatively on an entire sport, a sport that preaches safety, responsible team play, honor and integrity. It can be assumed the teen wounded by police officers would not have been shot if he had complied with the officers instructions to surrender as did the two other teens involved in the incident. Instead it was reported by the La Angeles Times the wounded teen did not comply with the police officers commands to surrender and made motions leading the officers to draw conclusions he was armed and reaching for a weapon. The weapon was an airsoft replica of a Berretta 92F pistol. The teen’s actions, and the teen’s actions alone, resulted in the tragic shooting. In my opinion SB-798 makes little sense and should be opposed by the entire airsoft community as a whole. On February 21, 2008 WFTV.com in Florida published a story about law enforcement agencies on the look out for pink colored handguns, or what they called “Hello Kitty” guns. It stated police officers could now be facing criminals with guns appearing to be toys adding to a heightened concern over brightly colored guns designed to look like toys. Gun dealers such as Jim’s Guns, Jim's Gun Supply - DuraCoat Refinishing, offer brightly colored finishes that can be applied to real firearms at their customers’ requests and gun manufacturers such as Charter Arms manufacture products like the “Pink Lady,” a 38 special revolver commercially available for sale to anyone who legally can purchase one. Bottom line, brightly colored guns exist in real steal versions and mandating airsoft replicas to be brightly colored will not resolve the problem of identifying a replica with certainty. In fact it can only add to more confusion when being confronted by an individual carrying a gun. On the other hand; the current laws in effect mandating a bright orange tip on all replicas do clearly identify replicas as a non-lethal firearms. This bright orange tip at then end of the barrel clearly identifies what is a real firearm and what is not. In my opinion California SB-798 is an overreaction by Lawmakers when common sense would suggest the incident that resulted in the crafting of SB-798 in December 2010 was the result of a teen unwilling to comply with police officers requests. It has not been determined if the officers could have, or would have, had the time to identify the pistol as real or as a replica given the fact it was dark out and a flashlight was used to confront the teens. Ultimately, the poor response of one teen refusing to comply with police officers requests to surrender while reaching for his replica resulted in a quick decision from officers taking control of a threatening situation. Even if brightly colored, the officer would have needed to access the situation quickly and respond accordingly leaving little time to identify the the gun as a replica. Although tragic, a brightly colored replica would not have prevented the shooting given the fact the teen refused to comply with officers requests, real guns are currently available in bright colors, and police officers would treat any instrument being brandished as a weapon as just that, a weapon and a threat to their and the surrounding communities safety Big Fish Adirondack Rangers | An Upstate NY Airsoft Team
     
  2. czcu

    czcu New Member

    16
    0
    ball
    I agree, a sport like airsoft can not be judge by on person's action. Airsoft has had a very little bad history.
     

  3. czcu

    czcu New Member

    16
    0
    ball
    There are reasons why there are restrictions on buying airsoft guns and BBs.
     
  4. Fisch

    Fisch New Member

    7
    0
    Queensbury
    Though this bill is hoping to make a recreational game safer to the public's eyes it's unfortunate side effect is that it could kill the airsofting industry in America such that many of our primary airsofting suppliers could go out of buissness due to reduced demand for the "tainted" replicas.
     
  5. Airsoft-dude13

    Airsoft-dude13 New Member

    12
    0
    Park City
    I can somewhat understand the senate's concern,but I have to say this is one of the most outrageous bills the senate has created; the majority of Airsoft guns cannot penatrate the skin,even from point blank.
     
  6. BigFish

    BigFish New Member

    9
    0
    Queensbury
    I don't see SB 798 as an issue of plastic pellets breaking skin. This is an issue about responsible players and those who are not. SB 798 is a response to players who failed to recognize not all people understand what airsoft is and put themselves and responding officers into a bad situation. This resulted in a player being shot by responding officers. Responsible players choose sanctioned areas to play our sport so as to not alarm people who would be rightfully concerned about someone running around their neighborhood with an airsoft replica that looks like a real firearm. Responsible players listen to law enforcement if they find themselves confronted by an officer greatly decreasing the chance someone will be harmed because of a misunderstanding. The color of a replica which SB 798 tries to address will not change the outcome of an incident if someone is acting irresponsibly since real firearms can be brightly colored which is more to the point I was making. Only responsible players can prevent putting themselves and responding law enforcement in a bad position, and this, in my opinion is why SB 798 is a misguided bill.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.