Joined
·
23 Posts
TL;DR: Your opinions on this article's statements about barrel length.
Hello there, Airsoft Society! I recently (mostly) built my own AEG based on the AR platform. This was my first time building an airsoft gun from the receiver up, and I hit many snags along the way. I also learned a lot too.
But one thing I'm still not entirely sure about are the factors governing range and accuracy, most notably barrel length. The gun I built has a 20" 6.03mm barrel (yes, it is as unwieldly as it sounds). I originally did this with the notion in my head that a longer barrel equals more time for the BB to be accelerated by the air in the piston cylinder, and therefore have a longer range. I also assumed that a tighter bore barrel would be more accurate. I picked a 20" barrel because it was the correct length for a full piston cylinder (i.e., no cutouts) that would use its full volume of air.
Upon receiving my gun back from Evike custom services (because I can't shim a gearbox to save my life), I hefted it and realized my mistake. I now want to make a shorter gun, but without sacrificing long-range accuracy. To this end, I am now doing a good amount of research and have come across a few articles that say that accuracy, range, and barrel length do not all increase linearly. To summarize: I know barrel length gets you better results up until a certain point, after which there are diminishing returns; also, there are other factors more important to range and accuracy (i.e., hopup and BB quality).
Most recently, I have read this article, and would like your opinions on its statements, specifically its statements on barrel length. What/how much effect does barrel length have on range? Is that article's claims accurate with your own experiences?
Thanks for reading my ramblings, any response is appreciated.
Hello there, Airsoft Society! I recently (mostly) built my own AEG based on the AR platform. This was my first time building an airsoft gun from the receiver up, and I hit many snags along the way. I also learned a lot too.
But one thing I'm still not entirely sure about are the factors governing range and accuracy, most notably barrel length. The gun I built has a 20" 6.03mm barrel (yes, it is as unwieldly as it sounds). I originally did this with the notion in my head that a longer barrel equals more time for the BB to be accelerated by the air in the piston cylinder, and therefore have a longer range. I also assumed that a tighter bore barrel would be more accurate. I picked a 20" barrel because it was the correct length for a full piston cylinder (i.e., no cutouts) that would use its full volume of air.
Upon receiving my gun back from Evike custom services (because I can't shim a gearbox to save my life), I hefted it and realized my mistake. I now want to make a shorter gun, but without sacrificing long-range accuracy. To this end, I am now doing a good amount of research and have come across a few articles that say that accuracy, range, and barrel length do not all increase linearly. To summarize: I know barrel length gets you better results up until a certain point, after which there are diminishing returns; also, there are other factors more important to range and accuracy (i.e., hopup and BB quality).
Most recently, I have read this article, and would like your opinions on its statements, specifically its statements on barrel length. What/how much effect does barrel length have on range? Is that article's claims accurate with your own experiences?
Thanks for reading my ramblings, any response is appreciated.